?

Log in

WE FUCKIN' DARE YOU!'s Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded in WE FUCKIN' DARE YOU!'s LiveJournal:

[ << Previous 20 ]
Monday, June 6th, 2005
8:53 am
[scottcrawford]
"YOU LOSE! GOOD DAY, SIR!"
Momentarily, I will be closing this place up. I'm probably not deleting it just yet, but it's obvious to me that she's dead, Jim. Thanks to all who made it amusing while it was, and to those who didn't, eat a dick. :D
Friday, May 27th, 2005
8:55 am
[scottcrawford]
This community will self-destruct on June 1st...
...unless someone actually gives a shit about it.

I just noticed an entry awaiting moderation...from October 31st. No good.

You've got until 6/1/05 to make something of yourselves, or I'm peeing on the fire.
Monday, January 17th, 2005
9:09 am
[scottcrawford]
Wednesday, September 22nd, 2004
2:05 pm
[scottcrawford]
That *should* take care of that.
damnitnicole, fearsclave, and prolixfootle, all of whom expressed an interest in moderating this dump a while back, are now blessed with maintainer accounts.

At some point, I need to dig up the review queue and see who's left in it.
Thursday, April 22nd, 2004
7:46 am
[scottcrawford]
This community
If your username is allanb, cirhosis, damnitnicole, degnernj, fearsclave, ingenuemuse, prolixfootle, savethewave, vesperia, scumm_boy, spankymc2teats, xircon, or youallboreme, let me know if you'd like to 0wn this community, and why. You won't be required to write reviews, just keep an eye on this place and hopefully get it the visibility that I'm giving things that are more interesting to me these days.

If someone doesn't accept it within a reasonable period of time and assure me that it'll be in good hands, I'm giving it to sugarvaulter, whether she actually wants it or not.

If your name isn't mentioned here: fuck off, cunt. Actually, if you can make a really strong case (which none of you did the last time I asked) for 0wnership, and if I feel I can trust you with my bouncing baby aborted fetus, perhaps we'll talk.

As for those of you who are still in the queue, including the person who added themselves today: suffer, until I'm damn well ready to make a decision.

Oh, and kittenkissies HAS BEEN BANNED for being a general cunt. That's all the reason I need. Ridicule away, lemmings!
1:38 am
[alexandradeyl]
Here you go.
username: alexandradeyl
Thursday, January 22nd, 2004
7:45 pm
[visualpollution]
Hey look! We got a Jester on our hands!
This time I'm going to review prolixfootle.

Unlike my last review, I have a good feeling they will actually see what I'm saying about them, which could be a good thing or a bad thing. Depending on how well they take scathing vicious criticism.

Rip me a new asshole, O Illustrious VisualpollutionCollapse )
2:14 am
[scottcrawford]
Updated Queue-01/22/04
In order of requests (with comments where applicable):

desidono

arielophelia fell victim to the "I don't want to be fucking bothered" provision. She's all yours, folks, but I'd make her buy you stuff or something. She's also welcome to buy me stuff, etc., as detailed in the provision.

arymede also fell victim to the "I don't want to be fucking bothered" provision.

sparklinsun also fell victim to the "I don't want to be fucking bothered" provision.

moronicabbage

prolixfootle-We'll see how I feel...feel free to get the first shot in, but there may be a re-review.

mojo_iv-Ditto here...

dopple

paigegirl

allanb-Calling dibs on this one. It's personal. >:D

binary_cyborg-Might do this one as well, but if anyone feels like doing it first, I'll just re-review.

revolutemind-Eh, maybe if I'm feeling generous with my time...=)

Recent Reviews (All done by me unless otherwise noted. No, I'm not giving you links to them. They're no more than a page back from here, you lazy fucks!):

scumm_boy: C+ (A C+ is also known as "The Ralphie", for you newcomers...)
cirhosis: C+
acidexia: A+
kashmirdreamer: 26 (done by mojo_iv, who still needs to explain their fucking ratings system to us, point out where "The Ralphie" lies on the scale, and give us a letter grade for this one.)
downfoot: C- (done by eeepeeep-I may actually do a re-review on this one, as I'm feelin' a bit frisky...)
ahotbabe: D (re-review done by visualpollution)

That's all for now. Make me proud, my devoted lemmings. =)
Thursday, January 15th, 2004
7:31 pm
[visualpollution]
reviewing ahotbabe
I've made my return to this community. I was the first member to join(except Scott, of course) and had the first review. I feel like reviewing people now, and I will only pick out people that I feel like viciously attacking and tearing a new asshole. So, I go over to the community info, check the members, first name, ahotbabe, I can already tell I'll be annoyed.

Pink and Blinkies, Good GodCollapse )
Wednesday, January 21st, 2004
3:27 am
[scottcrawford]
A few things...
1. The queue's closed again. I'll be going through it soon and deciding who to review, hopefully. DO NOT SUBMIT NEW REVIEW REQUESTS, OR ASK WHEN THE QUEUE'S RE-OPENING, OR YOU WILL BE BANNED FROM HERE TO BEIRUT, MOTHERFUCKER.

2. Reviews from other community members have been coming in slowly. It might take me a while to approve them, but they are appreciated, especially if they're well-written and capture the spirit of this place. However...

3. ...it has come to my attention that one such review did not follow the procedure I typically ask for on all duplicate reviews of the same user. I didn't have this in the Constitution prior to this, but I will be adding it.

"Reviewers, if you post a duplicate review of an applicant, you are to post it in the comments section of the first review. This is to prevent any applicant from getting more face time than they deserve, and keep the reviews neat and orderly. If you need more words than LiveJournal allows in individual comments, please feel free to include the rest of your review AS A REPLY TO YOUR FIRST COMMENT (the one with the first part of the review). A note that the review is "continued" is appreciated in each part of the review, in these cases. As much as I hate to do this to people who contribute reviews here, anyone ignoring this rule from here on will be removed, banned, ridiculed and sodomized."

visualpollution totally dodged a bullet here, because I hadn't bothered to add this to the Constitution as I stated earlier. I really hate the idea of banning any reviewer other than a completely shitty one, since I know what you endure to bring us the magic better than anyone here, so please, I beg of you, heed my warning!

All that aside, please keep the reviews coming, as it takes me FOREVER to do them these days.

4. Another new rule has been added to the Constitution. "The yourfairyking Memorial Rule: if you submit your journal for review, and abandon ship for a journal with a new username, tough shit. You're out, you're banned, and you're fuckin' ridiculed, baby!"

5. It goes without saying that, despite the potential joy we all could've shared from a review of someone who's used both dippydonut and yourfairyking as usernames, that wonderful person HAS BEEN BANNED! COMMENCE THE PUBLIC RIDICULE THREAD.
Sunday, January 18th, 2004
2:39 am
[ex_revolutem972]
review
while searching through my interests to see who else had egomania in common, I came upon 'the fuckin' dare'.

Please review my journal at your leisure.

warning: it has the same cocksucker tone as this message


thanks.
Monday, January 12th, 2004
4:25 am
[binary_cyborg]
go for it
im submiting my journal.
have at it.
binary_cyborg
hope its something interesting to you all.
Tuesday, December 30th, 2003
8:47 am
[allanb]
ufuckindaremewhatmothafucka?
yeah, do me baby. i'm bored.
Monday, December 29th, 2003
11:52 pm
[eeepeeep]
Review of downfoot
Well, I told scott that I'd post a review, and so I am.

So, just because he was the most recent request, I decided to give downfoot a read-over. I started off with the entries, then moved on to the userinfo, but I'll do the opposite here. Ryan (or ry ry, if you prefer) is a god-fearing high schooler out in crapstown michigan. The fact that he is A- in highschool, and B-in michigan earned him some sympathy points, but with interests including Jesus, praying, and the bible you know those points are getting burned away fast. He gets docked even more for his bio, which consists of naught but a "pg" rating. While this was the only quiz-type thing I noticed, I did see a couple of the other popular things that went around. Such as the "weapons of mass destruction" google.

If that doesn't marr your opinion of him, keep going, and read a few posts. With his most recent prayer to god (signed "weak and wounded sinner") he earned my animosity. I don't mind a little religion, but that should be confined to debate-style posts, or more private posts. No need to choke the world with your sappy BS. Other then that, the entries were acceptable, nothing too surprising besides a car crash on his way home from bible study, in which he broke the steering wheel with his chest, and a mention that christians are hypocrites. Keep in mind, I'm a christian myself. I'd just like to think myself a tad less false then the rest of them. While I've got my beliefs, you won't catch me within 10 miles of a abortion clinic protest, or any such useless crap. It doesn't work people, face it.

The layout was fairly standard for a free account, though the giant smiley faces were distracting, and obnoxious.

Overall, I give you a C-. Would be a boring C or C+, but the amount of religious ranting sickened me.
12:28 am
[downfoot]
Right then, this is me offering myself up for sacrifice. Judge it, tear it apart, rape it.

Current Mood: blah
Friday, December 26th, 2003
7:21 pm
[scottcrawford]
todger Has Been Banned!
The crime: Aggravated Tedium. This from a person who lists "acerbity" as an interest. Surely they could've done better here than what they displayed, but that's where they'd probably whip out the "I don't waste my A material on you" cop-out. What do you waste it on, todger, because it certainly isn't your "collection of last week's memes"-ass journal!

Commence the Public Ridicule Thread!
Thursday, December 25th, 2003
8:08 pm
[scottcrawford]
This community is up for grabs.
Convince me that I should give it to you, and it's yours.

Update: nah, I'm keeping it for now. You've failed to convince me that you're ready to assume the duties of protecting Sector 2814 from drunk, illiterate cheerleaders.
Tuesday, December 9th, 2003
11:00 am
[dippydonut]
Go on...
I'm ready!

Current Mood: cheerful
Monday, October 20th, 2003
1:59 am
[paigegirl]
I submit my journal.

Current Mood: Feeling stupidly brave
Monday, October 13th, 2003
12:03 pm
[mojo_iv]
[ << Previous 20 ]
My Big, Black Cock   About LiveJournal.com